Newsletters

The American Institute of CPAs in a March 31 letter to House of Representatives voiced its “strong support” for a series of tax administration bills passed in recent days.

The American Institute of CPAs in a March 31 letter to House of Representatives voiced its “strong support” for a series of tax administration bills passed in recent days.

The four bills highlighted in the letter include the Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act (H.R. 1152), the Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act (H.R. 998), the Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act (H.R. 517), and the Disaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act (H.R. 1491).

All four bills passed unanimously.

H.R. 1152 would apply the “mailbox” rule to electronically submitted tax returns and payments. Currently, a paper return or payment is counted as “received” based on the postmark of the envelope, but its electronic equivalent is counted as “received” when the electronic submission arrived or is reviewed. This bill would change all payment and tax form submissions to follow the mailbox rule, regardless of mode of delivery.

“The AICPA has previously recommended this change and thinks it would offer clarity and simplification to the payment and document submission process,” the organization said in the letter.

H.R. 998 “would require notices describing a mathematical or clerical error be made in plain language, and require the Treasury Secretary to provide additional procedures for requesting an abatement of a math or clerical adjustment, including by telephone or in person, among other provisions,” the letter states.

H.R. 517 would allow the IRS to grant federal tax relief once a state governor declares a state of emergency following a natural disaster, which is quicker than waiting for the federal government to declare a state of emergency as directed under current law, which could take weeks after the state disaster declaration. This bill “would also expand the mandatory federal filing extension under section 7508(d) from 60 days to 120 days, providing taxpayers with additional time to file tax returns following a disaster,” the letter notes, adding that increasing the period “would provide taxpayers and tax practitioners much needed relief, even before a disaster strikes.”

H.R. 1491 would extend deadlines for disaster victims to file for a tax refund or tax credit. The legislative solution “granting an automatic extension to the refund or credit lookback period would place taxpayers affected my major disasters on equal footing as taxpayers not impacted by major disasters and would afford greater clarity and certainty to taxpayers and tax practitioners regarding this lookback period,” AICPA said.

Also passed by the House was the National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act (H.R. 997) which, according to a summary of the bill on Congress.gov, “authorizes the National Taxpayer Advocate to appoint legal counsel within the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) to report directly to the National Taxpayer Advocate. The bill also expands the authority of the National Taxpayer Advocate to take personnel actions with respect to local taxpayer advocates (located in each state) to include actions with respect to any employee of TAS.”

Finally, the House passed H.R. 1155, the Recovery of Stolen Checks Act, which would require the Treasury to establish procedures that would allow a taxpayer to elect to receive replacement funds electronically from a physical check that was lost or stolen.

All bills passed unanimously. The passed legislation mirrors some of the provisions included in a discussion draft legislation issued by the Senate Finance Committee in January 2025. A section-by-section summary of the Senate discussion draft legislation can be found here.

AICPA’s tax policy and advocacy comment letters for 2025 can be found here.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The Tax Court ruled that the value claimed on a taxpayer’s return exceeded the value of a conversation easement by 7,694 percent. The taxpayer was a limited liability company, classified as a TEFRA partnership. The Tax Court used the comparable sales method, as backstopped by the price actually paid to acquire the property.

The Tax Court ruled that the value claimed on a taxpayer’s return exceeded the value of a conversation easement by 7,694 percent. The taxpayer was a limited liability company, classified as a TEFRA partnership. The Tax Court used the comparable sales method, as backstopped by the price actually paid to acquire the property.

The taxpayer was entitled to a charitable contribution deduction based on its fair market value. The easement was granted upon rural land in Alabama. The property was zoned A–1 Agricultural, which permitted agricultural and light residential use only. The property transaction at occurred at arm’s length between a willing seller and a willing buyer.

Rezoning

The taxpayer failed to establish that the highest and best use of the property before the granting of the easement was limestone mining. The taxpayer failed to prove that rezoning to permit mining use was reasonably probable.

Land Value

The taxpayer’s experts erroneously equated the value of raw land with the net present value of a hypothetical limestone business conducted on the land. It would not be profitable to pay the entire projected value of the business.

Penalty Imposed

The claimed value of the easement exceeded the correct value by 7,694 percent. Therefore, the taxpayer was liable for a 40 percent penalty for a gross valuation misstatement under Code Sec. 6662(h).

Ranch Springs, LLC, 164 TC No. 6, Dec. 62,636

State and local housing credit agencies that allocate low-income housing tax credits and states and other issuers of tax-exempt private activity bonds have been provided with a listing of the proper population figures to be used when calculating the 2025:

State and local housing credit agencies that allocate low-income housing tax credits and states and other issuers of tax-exempt private activity bonds have been provided with a listing of the proper population figures to be used when calculating the 2025:

• calendar-year population-based component of the state housing credit ceiling under Code Sec. 42(h)(3)(C)(ii);
• calendar-year private activity bond volume cap under Code Sec. 146; and
• exempt facility bond volume limit under Code Sec. 142(k)(5)

These figures are derived from the estimates of the resident populations of the 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, which were released by the Bureau of the Census on December 19, 2024. The figures for the insular areas of American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands are the midyear population figures in the U.S. Census Bureau’s International Database.

Notice 2025-18

The value of assets of a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trust includible in a decedent's gross estate was not reduced by the amount of a settlement intended to compensate the decedent for undistributed income.

The value of assets of a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trust includible in a decedent's gross estate was not reduced by the amount of a settlement intended to compensate the decedent for undistributed income.

The trust property consisted of an interest in a family limited partnership (FLP), which held title to ten rental properties, and cash and marketable securities. To resolve a claim by the decedent's estate that the trustees failed to pay the decedent the full amount of income generated by the FLP, the trust and the decedent's children's trusts agreed to be jointly and severally liable for a settlement payment to her estate. The Tax Court found an estate tax deficiency, rejecting the estate's claim that the trust assets should be reduced by the settlement amount and alternatively, that the settlement claim was deductible from the gross estate as an administration expense (P. Kalikow Est., Dec. 62,167(M), TC Memo. 2023-21).

Trust Not Property of the Estate

The estate presented no support for the argument that the liability affected the fair market value of the trust assets on the decedent's date of death. The trust, according to the court, was a legal entity that was not itself an asset of the estate. Thus, a liability that belonged to the trust but had no impact on the value of the underlying assets did not change the value of the gross estate. Furthermore, the settlement did not burden the trust assets. A hypothetical purchaser of the FLP interest, the largest asset of the trust, would not assume the liability and, therefore, would not regard the liability as affecting the price. When the parties stipulated the value of the FLP interest, the estate was aware of the undistributed income claim. Consequently, the value of the assets included in the gross estate was not diminished by the amount of the undistributed income claim.

Claim Not an Estate Expense

The claim was owed to the estate by the trust to correct the trustees' failure to distribute income from the rental properties during the decedent's lifetime. As such, the claim was property included in the gross estate, not an expense of the estate. The court explained that even though the liability was owed by an entity that held assets included within the taxable estate, the claim itself was not an estate expense. The court did not address the estate's theoretical argument that the estate would be taxed twice on the underlying assets held in the trust and the amount of the settlement because the settlement was part of the decedent's residuary estate, which was distributed to a charity. As a result, the claim was not a deductible administration expense of the estate.

P.B. Kalikow, Est., CA-2

An individual was not entitled to deduct flowthrough loss from the forfeiture of his S Corporation’s portion of funds seized by the U.S. Marshals Service for public policy reasons. The taxpayer pleaded guilty to charges of bribery, fraud and money laundering. Subsequently, the U.S. Marshals Service seized money from several bank accounts held in the taxpayer’s name or his wholly owned corporation. 

An individual was not entitled to deduct flowthrough loss from the forfeiture of his S Corporation’s portion of funds seized by the U.S. Marshals Service for public policy reasons. The taxpayer pleaded guilty to charges of bribery, fraud and money laundering. Subsequently, the U.S. Marshals Service seized money from several bank accounts held in the taxpayer’s name or his wholly owned corporation. The S corporation claimed a loss deduction related to its portion of the asset seizures on its return and the taxpayer reported a corresponding passthrough loss on his return.

However, Courts have uniformly held that loss deductions for forfeitures in connection with a criminal conviction frustrate public policy by reducing the "sting" of the penalty. The taxpayer maintained that the public policy doctrine did not apply here, primarily because the S corporation was never indicted or charged with wrongdoing. However, even if the S corporation was entitled to claim a deduction for the asset seizures, the public policy doctrine barred the taxpayer from reporting his passthrough share. The public policy doctrine was not so rigid or formulaic that it may apply only when the convicted person himself hands over a fine or penalty.

Hampton, TC Memo. 2025-32, Dec. 62,642(M)

The IRS has joined with several leading nonprofit groups to highlight a special tax provision that allows more people to deduct donations to qualifying charities on their 2021 income tax return. Accordingly, the Independent Sector and National Council of Nonprofits joined with the IRS to highlight this pandemic-related provision where married couples filing jointly can deduct up to $600 in cash donations and individual taxpayers can deduct up to $300 in donations.

The IRS has joined with several leading nonprofit groups to highlight a special tax provision that allows more people to deduct donations to qualifying charities on their 2021 income tax return. Accordingly, the Independent Sector and National Council of Nonprofits joined with the IRS to highlight this pandemic-related provision where married couples filing jointly can deduct up to $600 in cash donations and individual taxpayers can deduct up to $300 in donations.

Taxpayers do not need to itemize deductions on their tax returns, under the temporary law, to take advantage of the tax provision, which creates tax-favorable donation options not normally available to about 90 percent of tax filers. Ordinarily, people who choose to take the standard deduction cannot claim a deduction for their charitable contributions. But this special provision permits them to claim a limited deduction on their 2021 federal income tax returns for cash contributions made to qualifying charitable organizations by December 31, 2021.

Further, the IRS highlighted the new provision and urged people to make sure they donate to a qualifying charity. The special Tax Exempt Organization Search tool on the IRS website can help people make sure they donate to a qualified charity. Cash contributions to most charitable organizations qualify for a deduction. But contributions made either to supporting organizations or to establish or maintain a donor advised fund do not. Contributions carried forward from prior years do not qualify, nor do contributions to most private foundations and most cash contributions to charitable remainder trusts.

Nearly nine in ten taxpayers take the standard deduction and could potentially qualify. Under this provision, tax year 2021 individual tax filers, including married individuals filing separate returns, can claim a deduction of up to $300 for cash contributions made to qualifying charities during 2021. The maximum deduction is increased to $600 for married individuals filing joint returns. Moreover, cash contributions include those made by check, credit card or debit card as well as amounts incurred by an individual for unreimbursed out-of-pocket expenses in connection with their volunteer services to a qualifying charitable organization. However, cash contributions do not include the value of volunteer services, securities, household items or other property.

Finally, the IRS encouraged all donors to be wary of scams masked as charitable solicitations. Criminals create fake charities to take advantage of the public’s generosity. Fake charities once again made the IRS's Dirty Dozen list of tax scams for 2021. In October, the IRS also joined international organizations and other regulators in highlighting the fight against charity fraud.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued the final rule implementing the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Program.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued the final rule implementing the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Program.

The program, created as part of the American Rescue Plan, provides $350 billion to state, local, and tribal governments to support their response to the COVID-19 pandemic, ensuring they have resources to provide for health and vaccine services, funding to support families and business who might be struggling with the economic impacts of the pandemic, and maintaining vital public services.

The final rule, announced January 6, includes some changes from the interim final rule that was issued and went into effect in May 2021. According to a summary document issued by the Treasury Department, the final rule "delivers broader flexibility and greater simplicity in the program."

Among the changes, the final rule includes:

• an expansion of the non-exhaustive list of uses that recipients can use to respond to COVID-19 and its economic impacts, including clarifying that funds can be used for certain capital expenditures to respond to the pandemic;

• an expansion of support for public sector hiring and capacity;

• a streamlined option to provide premium pay for essential workers;

• a broadening of eligible water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure projects; and

• a simplified program for small localities.

The Treasury Department said it has distributed more than $245 billion in funds under this program in 2021.

The full text of the final rule, goes into effect on April 1, 2022. Until then, the interim final rule remains in effect. However, the summary document notes that "recipients can choose to take advantage of the final rule’s flexibilities and simplifications now, even ahead of the effective date. Treasury will not take action to enforce the interim final rule to the extent that a use of funds is consistent with the terms of the final rule, regardless of when the SLFRF funds were used."

The IRS extended several deadlines related to the low-income housing credit, in response to the continuing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and precautions necessitated by new disease variants.

Notice 2022-5

The IRS extended several deadlines related to the low-income housing credit, in response to the continuing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and precautions necessitated by new disease variants. The extensions generally apply to deadlines that occur between April 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022, for the:

• 10-percent test for carryover allocations,

• 24-month minimum rehabilitation expenditure period (through December 31, 2023),

• placed in service deadline,

• reasonable period for restoration or replacement after a casualty loss,

• period for satisfying occupancy obligations, and

• correction period.

Certain requirements for housing agencies are also postponed or temporarily waived, including tenant file reviews, physical inspections to monitor compliance, availability of common areas and amenities, the conduct of public hearings, and the provision of emergency housing for medical personnel and other essential workers.

Finally, for qualified residential rental projects, the 12-month transition period is extended through 2022, and the two-year rehabilitation expenditure period for bonds is extended through 2023.

Notice 2020-23, Notice 2020-53, Notice 2021-12, Notice 2021-17, Rev. Proc. 2004-39, Rev. Proc. 2014-49, and Rev. Proc. 2014-50 are amplified.

Two recent reports, one from the Internal Revenue Service and the other from the National Taxpayer Advocate, show how the ongoing pandemic exposed the effects of being an underfunded agency.

Two recent reports, one from the Internal Revenue Service and the other from the National Taxpayer Advocate, show how the ongoing pandemic exposed the effects of being an underfunded agency.

The IRS in its recently issued Progress Update report for fiscal year 2021, highlights some of those issues caused by the pandemic and how the agency is working to respond to them.

In a separate blog post about the report, IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig noted that the agency is "working through tax returns filed in 2021 and we are unable to answer an unprecedented number of telephone calls. Simply put, in many areas we are unable to deliver the amount of service and enforcement our taxpayers and tax system deserves and needs."

He said the IRS will do all it can in 2022 and beyond with the resources it has, but added that "additional resources would help our employees do more in 2022 and beyond".

Indeed, the progress report highlights that the agency "lost more critical full-time positions between FY 2020 and FY 2021, which included key enforcement personnel. These loses included revenue agents and revenue officers who audit returns and perform collection activities, as well as special agents in our Criminal Investigations organization who investigate tax-related crimes and other issues. Although our workforce increased since FY 2019, the IRS FY 2021 permanent workforce is still below the FY 2010 permanent workforce level."

In spite of the challenges, the report highlighted some of the year’s successes, including distributing a third round of economic stimulus payments and other changes that were part of the American Rescue Plan, issuing a Spanish-language Form 1040, a 93 percent conviction rate within its Criminal Investigations division, and collecting $4.1 trillion in gross tax receipts.

National Taxpayer Advocate More Critical

While the IRS report focused on more of the positive accomplishments of the agency in FY 2021, the National Taxpayer Advocate’s annual report to Congress painted a more critical picture of a struggling agency, with one key agreement – that the agency needs more resources to effectively do its job.

"Over the past year, there has been a tendency to focus on the unique challenges posed by the pandemic and to attribute IRS service and technology shortcomings to these circumstances", National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins wrote in the report. "There is no doubt the pandemic has had a big impact, but taxpayer services and technology at the IRS were inadequate long before the pandemic."

For example, she notes that the number of individual returns has increased by 19 percent since FY 2010 while the agency’s baseline appropriation on an inflation-adjusted basis has decreased by nearly 20 percent. One way this has affected the agency was in its ability to answer calls, something it was struggling to do prior to the pandemic. In FY 2019, it received nearly 100 million calls, but answered only 29 million calls.

"That is simply a resource issue. Additional technology resources and more employees are required if the IRS is going to answer more telephone calls," Collins said.

The NTA report also noted that as of December 18, 2021, the IRS reported 2.3 million unprocessed returns and amended returns.

"We have seen cases where processing has taken considerably longer than 20 weeks, including more than a year," Collins said in the report. "The manual reviews will take substantial time, preventing the IRS from digging out of that hole in the foreseeable future."

It also noted that the agency took months to process taxpayer responses to IRS notices, delaying refunds and in some cases leading to premature collection notices.

The limited resources also affected the Taxpayer Advocate Service from doing its job adequately.

"Congress created TAS to serve as a ‘safety net’ for taxpayers, but over the past few years, the combination of more cases, fewer experienced Case Advocates, and an inability to close cases due to limited IRS resources has caused the TAS safety net to fray," Collins reported, noting that the number of cases from FY 2017 to FY 2021 rose by 58 percent while inflation-adjusted funding decreased by six percent. Cases comes from congressional referral rose dramatically as well, from an average of 10,000-11,000 referrals per year to 66,000 referrals last year.

Collins made a number of recommendations, including providing the agency with more funding; reduce barriers to e-filing; hire more customer service representatives and implement call-back technology to eliminate people waiting on hold; expand online functionality; and improve communications with taxpayers.

The IRS has encouraged taxpayers to take important actions this month to help them file their tax returns in 2022, including special steps related to Economic Impact Payments and advance Child Tax Credit payments. As a part of a series of reminders to help taxpayers get ready for the upcoming tax filing season, the IRS highlighted a special page the outlines the steps taxpayers can take to make the tax filing season easier.

The IRS has encouraged taxpayers to take important actions this month to help them file their tax returns in 2022, including special steps related to Economic Impact Payments and advance Child Tax Credit payments. As a part of a series of reminders to help taxpayers get ready for the upcoming tax filing season, the IRS highlighted a special page the outlines the steps taxpayers can take to make the tax filing season easier.

Advance Child Tax Credit Payments

The IRS advised families who received advance payments to compare the advance Child Tax Credit payments that they received in 2021 with the amount of the Child Tax Credit that they can properly claim on their 2021 tax return. Taxpayers who received less than the amount for which they're eligible can claim a credit for the remaining amount of Child Tax Credit on their 2021 tax return. Similarly, taxpayers who received more than the amount for which they're eligible may need to repay some or all of the excess payment when they file. Additionally, eligible families who did not get monthly advance payments in 2021 can still get a lump-sum payment by claiming the Child Tax Credit when they file a 2021 federal income tax return next year. This includes families who don’t normally need to file a return.

The IRS announced that it would send Letter 6419 in January 2022 with the total amount of advance Child Tax Credit payments taxpayers received in 2021. Taxpayers should keep this and any other IRS letters about advance Child Tax Credit payments with their tax records.

Economic Impact Payments and Recovery Rebate Credit

Individuals who failed to qualify for the third Economic Impact Payment (EIP) or did not receive the full amount may be eligible for the Recovery Rebate Credit based on their 2021 tax information. Accordingly, these individuals will need to file a 2021 tax return, even if they do not usually file, to claim the credit. Further, individuals will also need the amount of their third EIP and any Plus-Up Payments received to calculate their correct 2021 Recovery Rebate Credit amount when they file their tax return.

Charitable Deduction Changes

Finally, taxpayers who do not itemize deductions may qualify to take a charitable deduction of up to $600 for married taxpayers filing joint returns and up to $300 for all other filers for cash contributions made in 2021 to qualifying organizations.

The IRS has extended the availability of electronic signatures on certain audit and non-audit forms. Through October 31, 2023, taxpayers and their authorized representatives may electronically sign documents and email documents to the IRS. This is an exception to normal policy. Previously, the IRS had allowed e-signatures through the end of 2021.

The IRS has extended the availability of electronic signatures on certain audit and non-audit forms. Through October 31, 2023, taxpayers and their authorized representatives may electronically sign documents and email documents to the IRS. This is an exception to normal policy. Previously, the IRS had allowed e-signatures through the end of 2021.

Audit or Collection

The Service will accept e-signatures during audit or collection for:

• extensions of statute of limitations on an assessment or collection;

• waivers of statutory notice of deficiency and consents to an assessment;

• closing agreements; and

• other statements or forms collected outside standard filing procedures.

The IRS accepts two types of electronic signatures during an audit or collection interaction (1) digital signatures, and (2) imaged signatures. Regarding imaging signatures, taxpayers that do not have a digital certificate may hand sign a document, and then scan or photograph the document and save it in a standard picture format such as JPEG, TIFF or PDF.

Other Forms That Can Be Electronically Signed

Electronic signatures are also allowed through October 31, 2023 for the following forms and purposes:

• Form 11-C, Occupational Tax and Registration Return for Wagering;

• Form 637, Application for Registration (For Certain Excise Tax Activities);

• Form 706, U.S. Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return;

• Form 706-A, U.S. Additional Estate Tax Return;

• Form 706-GS(D), Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Return for Distributions;

• Form 706-GS(D-1), Notification of Distribution from a Generation-Skipping Trust;

• Form 706-GS(T), Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Return for Terminations;

• Form 706-QDT, U.S. Estate Tax Return for Qualified Domestic Trusts;

• Form 706 Schedule R-1, Generation Skipping Transfer Tax;

• Form 706-NA, U.S. Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return;

• Form 709, U.S. Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return;

• Form 730, Monthly Tax Return for Wagers;

• Form 1042, Annual Withholding Tax Return for U.S. Source Income of Foreign Persons;

• Form 1066, U.S. Income Tax Return for Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit;

• Form 1120-C, U.S. Income Tax Return for Cooperative Associations;

• Form 1120-FSC, U.S. Income Tax Return of a Foreign Sales Corporation;

• Form 1120-H, U.S. Income Tax Return for Homeowners Associations;

• Form 1120-IC DISC, Interest Charge Domestic International Sales – Corporation Return;

• Form 1120-L, U.S. Life Insurance Company Income Tax Return;

• Form 1120-ND, Return for Nuclear Decommissioning Funds and Certain Related Persons;

• Form 1120-PC, U.S. Property and Casualty Insurance Company Income Tax Return;

• Form 1120-REIT, U.S. Income Tax Return for Real Estate Investment Trusts;

• Form 1120-RIC, U.S. Income Tax Return for Regulated Investment Companies;

• Form 1120-SF, U.S. Income Tax Return for Settlement Funds (Under Section 468B);

• Form 1127, Application for Extension of Time for Payment of Tax Due to Undue Hardship;

• Form 1128, Application to Adopt, Change or Retain a Tax Year;

• Form 2678, Employer/Payer Appointment of Agent;

• Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method;

• Form 3520, Annual Return to Report Transactions with Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts;

• Form 3520-A, Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner;

• Form 4421, Declaration – Executor’s Commissions and Attorney’s Fees;

• Form 4768, Application for Extension of Time to File a Return and/or Pay U.S. Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Taxes;

• Form 8038, Information Return for Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bond Issues;

• Form 8038-G, Information Return for Tax-Exempt Governmental Bonds;

• Form 8038-GC; Information Return for Small Tax-Exempt Governmental Bond Issues, Leases, and Installment Sales;

• Form 8283, Noncash Charitable Contributions;

• Form 8453 series, Form 8878 series, and Form 8879 series regarding IRS e-file Signature Authorization Forms;

• Form 8802, Application for U.S. Residency Certification;

• Form 8832, Entity Classification Election;

• Form 8971, Information Regarding Beneficiaries Acquiring Property from a Decedent;

• Form 8973, Certified Professional Employer Organization/Customer Reporting Agreement; and

• Elections made pursuant to Code Sec. 83(b).

The IRS has issued guidance for employers on the retroactive termination of the COVID-19 employee retention credit against the employer's share of Medicare tax. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58) amended Code Sec. 3134 so that for most employers the credit applies only to wages paid before October 1, 2021. If the employer is a recovery startup business, the credit continues to apply to wages paid before January 1, 2022.

The IRS has issued guidance for employers on the retroactive termination of the COVID-19 employee retention credit against the employer's share of Medicare tax. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58) amended Code Sec. 3134 so that for most employers the credit applies only to wages paid before October 1, 2021. If the employer is a recovery startup business, the credit continues to apply to wages paid before January 1, 2022.

The guidance applies to employers that:

• paid wages after September 30, 2021,

• either received an advance payment of the credit for those wages, or reduced employment tax deposits in anticipation of the credit for the fourth quarter of 2021, but

• are ineligible for the credit due to the change in the law.

Advance Payments

Employers that are not recovery startup businesses but received advance payments of the employee retention credit for fourth quarter wages of 2021 can avoid failure to pay penalties if they repay those amounts by the due date of their applicable employment tax returns. Failure to repay the advance payment by the due date may result in the IRS imposing failure to pay penalties.

Reduced Employment Tax Deposits

Employers that reduced deposits on or before December 20, 2021, for wages paid during the fourth calendar quarter of 2021 in anticipation of the employee retention credit but are not recovery startup businesses will not be subject to a failure to deposit penalty for the retained deposits if they:

• reduced deposits in anticipation of the credit, consistent with the rules in Notice 2021-24;

• deposit the amounts initially retained in anticipation of the credit on or before the relevant due date for wages paid on December 31, 2021, regardless of whether the employer actually pays wages on that date; and

• report the tax liability resulting from the termination of the credit on the applicable employment tax return or schedule that includes the period from October 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021.

Failure to Deposit Penalty Waiver

Due to the termination of the employee retention credit for wages paid in the fourth quarter of 2021 for employers that are not recovery startup businesses, the IRS will not waive failure to deposit penalties for employers that reduce deposits in anticipation of the employee retention credit after December 20, 2021.

Reasonable Cause Relief

Employers that do not qualify for relief under this guidance can reply to an IRS penalty notice with an explanation. The IRS will consider reasonable cause relief.

Effect on Other Documents

This guidance modifies Notice 2021-49, IRB 2021-34, 316, and Notice 2021-24, IRB 2021-18, 1122.

The IRS has reminded tax professionals and taxpayers that they can use digital signatures on a variety of common IRS forms and access a secure online platform to view and make changes to their account. The IRS has balanced the e-signature option with critical security and protection needed against identity theft and fraud.

The IRS has reminded tax professionals and taxpayers that they can use digital signatures on a variety of common IRS forms and access a secure online platform to view and make changes to their account. The IRS has balanced the e-signature option with critical security and protection needed against identity theft and fraud. The Service has informed taxpayers that acceptable electronic signature methods include:

• a typed name on a signature block;

• a scanned or digitized image of a handwritten signature that's attached to an electronic record;

• a handwritten signature input onto an electronic signature pad;

• a handwritten signature, mark or command input on a display screen with a stylus device; or

• a signature created by a third-party software.

The IRS will accept images of signatures (scanned or photographed) including common file types supported by Microsoft 365 such as .tiff, .jpg, .jpeg, .pdf, Microsoft Office suite, or Zip. Further, the IRS allows taxpayers and representatives to use electronic or digital signatures on certain paper forms which they cannot file using IRS e-file. The forms are available on the IRS website and through tax professional's software products.

The IRS has also added a new feature this year, which gives taxpayers digital control over who can represent them or view their tax records. The new feature, one of many recent enhancements to the Online Account for individuals, will allow individual taxpayers to authorize their tax practitioner to represent them before the IRS with a Power of Attorney (POA) and to view their tax accounts with a Tax Information Authorization (TIA). Tax professionals may go to the new Tax Pro Account on IRS.gov to digitally initiate POAs and TIAs. These digital authorization requests are simpler versions of Forms 2848 and 8821.

This new digital authorization option will allow the IRS to reduce its current CAF inventory and to focus on authorization requests received through fax, mail or the Submit Forms 2848 and 8821 Online – all of which require IRS personnel to handle. The Security Summit partners remind all tax professionals to review their security measures. IRS Publication 4557, Safeguarding Taxpayer Data (.pdf), provides tax pros with a starting point for basic steps to protect clients. IRS Publication 5293, Data Security Resource Guide for Tax Professionals (.pdf), provides a compilation of data theft information available on IRS.gov, including the reporting processes.

The IRS has reminded taxpayers that they can get extra protection starting in January by joining the Service's Identity Protection Personal Identification Number (IP PIN) program. The IRS has made recent changes to the program to make it easier for more taxpayers to join. The fastest and easiest way to receive an IP Pin is by using the Get an IP PIN tool.

The IRS has reminded taxpayers that they can get extra protection starting in January by joining the Service's Identity Protection Personal Identification Number (IP PIN) program. The IRS has made recent changes to the program to make it easier for more taxpayers to join. The fastest and easiest way to receive an IP Pin is by using the Get an IP PIN tool.

The IRS has urged any IP PIN applicant previously rejected during the identity authentication process to try applying again in 2022. The authentication process has been refined and improved, now enabling many taxpayers screened out in the past to have a better chance of passing the authentication process. Taxpayers are requested to keep in mind these key points about the IP PIN program:

• For 2022, the Get an IP PIN tool is scheduled to launch on January 10. It’s the fastest and easiest way to get an IP PIN. It is also the only option that immediately reveals the IP PIN to the taxpayer. For that reason, the IRS urges everyone to try the Get an IP PIN tool first, before pursuing other options.

• No identity theft affidavit is required for taxpayers opting in.

• The IP PIN is valid for one year.

• Taxpayers should enter the IP PIN on any return, whether it is filed electronically or on paper.

• Anyone with either a Social Security number (SSN) or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) who can verify their identity is eligible for the IP PIN opt-in program.

• Any eligible family member can get an IP PIN.

• Taxpayers should never reveal an IP PIN to anyone. The only exception is a taxpayer who uses a trusted tax professional to file their return.

There are two options have been made available for people who cannot pass the IRS online identity authentication process. One involves filing Form 15227 and the other requires a visit to an IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center (TAC). Further, for processing year 2022, individuals with an adjusted gross income of $73,000 or less and those married filing jointly with an AGI of $146,000 or less with access to a telephone can complete Form 15227 (.pdf) and either mail or fax it to the IRS. Any taxpayer who is ineligible to file a Form 15227 may make an appointment to visit an IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center (TAC). Anyone using this option must bring two forms of picture identification. Because this is an in- person identity verification, an IP PIN will be mailed to the taxpayer after their visit. To find the nearest TAC, taxpayers can use the IRS Local Office Locator online tool or call 844-545-5640.

The Internal Revenue Service is now allowing taxpayers who have had an offer in compromise accepted by the agency to keep their tax refunds instead of the previous policy of having those refunds applied to their outstanding tax debt.

An offer in compromise (OIC) happens when the IRS and the taxpayer settle past due taxes for an amount that is less than the full amount owed. This typically happens when the agency agrees with the taxpayer that the payment in full will create a financial burden.

"For taxpayers facing an economic hardship, the anticipation of a refund may be the safety pin holding together a family’s ability to meet basic living expenses, especially for taxpayers relying on the Earned Income Tax Credit or the Additional Child Tax Credit that Congress intended for subsistence of low-income taxpayers," National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins said in a recent blog post discussing the changes, which went into effect in November. She added that it will also help those who are struggling financially because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The blog notes that the filing of an amended return could cause the refund to be applied to an existing debt rather than being sent to the taxpayer.

Additionally, the agency announced that certain taxpayers will be able to seek an offset bypass refund while OIC decisions are pending, although taxpayers need to be proactive in contacting the IRS if they want an offset bypass refund, as there is no formal form to request it.

No use worrying. More than five million people every year have problems getting their refund checks so your situation is not uncommon. Nevertheless, you should be aware of the rules, and the steps to take if your refund doesn't arrive.

Average wait time

The IRS suggests that you allow for "the normal processing time" before inquiring about your refund. The IRS's "normal processing time" is approximately:

• Paper returns: 6 weeks
• E-filed returns: 3 weeks
• Amended returns: 12 weeks
• Business returns: 6 weeks

IRS website "Where's my refund?" tool

The IRS now has a tool on its website called "Where's my refund?" which generally allows you to access information about your refund 72 hours after the IRS acknowledges receipt of your e-filed return, or three to four weeks after mailing a paper return. The "Where's my refund?" tool can be accessed at www.irs.gov.

To get out information about your refund on the IRS's website, you will need to provide the following information from your return:

• Your Social Security Number (or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number);
• Filing status (Single, Married Filing Joint Return, Married Filing Separate Return, Head of Household, or Qualifying Widow(er)); and
• The exact whole dollar amount of your refund.

 Start a refund trace

If you have not received your refund within 28 days from the original IRS mailing date shown on Where's My Refund?, you can start a refund trace online.

Getting a replacement check

If you or your representative contacts the IRS, the IRS will determine if your refund check has been cashed. If the original check has not been cashed, a replacement check will be issued. If it has been cashed, get ready for a long wait as the IRS processes a replacement check.

The IRS will send you a photocopy of the cashed check and endorsement with a claim form. After you send it back, the IRS will investigate. Sometimes, it takes the IRS as long as one year to complete its investigation, before it cuts you a replacement check.

A bigger problem

Another problem may come to the fore when the IRS is contacted about the refund. It might tell you that it never received your tax return in the first place. Here's where some quick action is important.

First, you are required to show that you filed your return on time. That's a situation when a post-office or express mail receipt really comes in handy. Second, get another, signed copy off to the IRS as quickly as possible to prevent additional penalties and interest in case the IRS really can prove that you didn't file in the first place.

Minimize the risks

When filing your return, you can choose to have your refund directly deposited into a bank account. If you file a paper return, you can request direct deposit by giving your bank account and routing numbers on your return. If you e-file, you could also request direct deposit. All these alternatives to receiving a paper check minimize the chances of your refund getting lost or misplaced.

If you've moved since filing your return, it's possible that the IRS sent your refund check to the wrong address. If it is returned to the IRS, a refund will not be reissued until you notify the IRS of your new address. You have to use a special IRS form.

IRS may have a reason

You may not have received your refund because the IRS believes that you aren't entitled to one. Refund claims are reviewed -usually only in a cursory manner-- by an IRS service center or district office. Odds are, however, that unless your refund is completely out of line with your income and payments, the IRS will send you a check unless it spots a mathematical error through its data-entry processing. It will only be later, if and when you are audited, that the IRS might challenge the size of your refund on its merits.

IRS liability

If the IRS sends the refund check to the wrong address, it is still liable for the refund because it has not paid "the claimant." It is also still liable for the refund if it pays the check on a forged endorsement. Direct deposit refunds that are misdirected to the wrong account through no fault of your own are treated the same as lost or stolen refund checks.

The IRS can take back refunds that were paid by mistake. In an erroneous refund action, the IRS generally has the burden of proving that the refund was a mistake. Nevertheless, although you may be in the right and eventually get your refund, it may take you up to a year to collect. One consolation: if payment of a refund takes more than 45 days, the IRS must pay interest on it.

If you are still worrying about your refund check, please give this office a call. We can track down your refund and seek to resolve any problem that the IRS may believe has developed.