Newsletters
The IRS encouraged taxpayers to make essential preparations and be aware of significant changes that may affect their 2024 tax returns. The deadline for submitting Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Ta...
The IRS reminded taxpayers to choose the right tax professional to help them avoid tax-related identity theft and financial harm. Following are key tips for choosing a tax preparer:Look for a preparer...
The IRS provided six tips to help taxpayers file their 2024 tax returns more easily. Taxpayers should follow these steps for a smoother filing process:Gather all necessary tax paperwork and records to...
The IRS released the optional standard mileage rates for 2025. Most taxpayers may use these rates to compute deductible costs of operating vehicles for:business,medical, andcharitable purposesSome mem...
The IRS, in partnership with the Coalition Against Scam and Scheme Threats (CASST), has unveiled new initiatives for the 2025 tax filing season to counter scams targeting taxpayers and tax professio...
The IRS reminded disaster-area taxpayers that they have until February 3, 2025, to file their 2023 returns, in the entire states of Louisiana and Vermont, all of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands and...
The IRS has announced plans to issue automatic payments to eligible individuals who failed to claim the Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. The credit, a refundable benefit for individ...
Effective February 1, 2025, the city of Walnut, Mississippi begins imposing a 3% Walnut Parks and Recreation Tax on (1) the gross proceeds of hotel and motel room rentals, and (2) the gross proceeds o...
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has announced that the mandatory beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirement under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is back in effect. Because reporting companies may need additional time to comply with their BOI reporting obligations, FinCEN is generally extending the deadline 30 calendar days from February 19, 2025, for most companies.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has announced that the mandatory beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirement under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is back in effect. Because reporting companies may need additional time to comply with their BOI reporting obligations, FinCEN is generally extending the deadline 30 calendar days from February 19, 2025, for most companies.
FinCEN's announcement is based on the decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Tyler Division) to stay its prior nationwide injunction order against the reporting requirement (Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, DC Tex., 6:24-cv-00336, Feb. 17, 2025). This district court stayed its prior order, pending appeal, in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent order to stay the nationwide injunction against the reporting requirement that had been ordered by a different federal district court in Texas (McHenry v. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., SCt, No. 24A653, Jan. 23, 2025).
Given this latest district court decision, the regulations implementing the BOI reporting requirements of the CTA are no longer stayed.
Updated Reporting Deadlines
Subject to any applicable court orders, BOI reporting is now mandatory, but FinCEN is providing additional time for companies to report:
- For most reporting companies, the extended deadline to file an initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI report is now March 21, 2025. FinCEN expects to provide an update before that date of any further modification of the deadline, recognizing that reporting companies may need additional time to comply.
- Reporting companies that were previously given a reporting deadline later than March 21, 2025, must file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. For example, if a company’s reporting deadline is in April 2025 because it qualifies for certain disaster relief extensions, it should follow the April deadline, not the March deadline.
Plaintiffs in National Small Business United v. Yellen, DC Ala., No. 5:22-cv-01448, are not required to report their beneficial ownership information to FinCEN at this time.
The IRS has issued Notice 2025-15, providing guidance on an alternative method for furnishing health coverage statements under Code Secs. 6055 and 6056. This method allows insurers and applicable large employers (ALEs) to comply with their reporting obligations by posting an online notice rather than automatically furnishing statements to individuals.
The IRS has issued Notice 2025-15, providing guidance on an alternative method for furnishing health coverage statements under Code Secs. 6055 and 6056. This method allows insurers and applicable large employers (ALEs) to comply with their reporting obligations by posting an online notice rather than automatically furnishing statements to individuals.
Under Code Sec. 6055, entities providing minimum essential coverage must report coverage details to the IRS and furnish statements to responsible individuals. Similarly, Code Sec. 6056 requires ALEs, generally those with 50 or more full-time employees, to report health insurance information for those employees. The Paperwork Burden Reduction Act amended these sections to introduce an alternative furnishing method, effective for statements related to returns for calendar years after 2023.
Instead of automatically providing statements, reporting entities may post a clear and conspicuous notice on their websites, informing individuals that they may request a copy of their statement. The notice must be posted by the original furnishing deadline, including any automatic 30-day extension, and must remain accessible through October 15 of the following year. If a responsible individual or full-time employee requests a statement, the reporting entity must furnish it within 30 days of the request or by January 31 of the following year, whichever is later.
For statements related to the 2024 calendar year, the notice must be posted by March 3, 2025. Statements may be furnished electronically if permitted under Reg. § 1.6055-2 for minimum essential coverage providers and Reg. § 301.6056-2 for ALEs.
This alternative method applies regardless of whether the individual shared responsibility payment under Code Sec. 5000A is zero. The guidance clarifies that this method applies to statements required under both Code Sec. 6055 and Code Sec. 6056. Reg. § 1.6055-1(g)(4)(ii)(B) sets forth the requirements for the alternative manner of furnishing statements under Code Sec. 6055, while the same framework applies to Code Sec. 6056 with relevant terminology adjustments. Form 1095-B, used for reporting minimum essential coverage, and Form 1095-C, used by ALEs to report health insurance offers, may be provided under this alternative method.
The IRS has issued the luxury car depreciation limits for business vehicles placed in service in 2025 and the lease inclusion amounts for business vehicles first leased in 2025.
The IRS has issued the luxury car depreciation limits for business vehicles placed in service in 2025 and the lease inclusion amounts for business vehicles first leased in 2025.
Luxury Passenger Car Depreciation Caps
The luxury car depreciation caps for a passenger car placed in service in 2025 limit annual depreciation deductions to:
- $12,200 for the first year without bonus depreciation
- $20,200 for the first year with bonus depreciation
- $19,600 for the second year
- $11,800 for the third year
- $7,060 for the fourth through sixth year
Depreciation Caps for SUVs, Trucks and Vans
The luxury car depreciation caps for a sport utility vehicle, truck, or van placed in service in 2025 are:
- $12,200 for the first year without bonus depreciation
- $20,200 for the first year with bonus depreciation
- $19,600 for the second year
- $11,800 for the third year
- $7,060 for the fourth through sixth year
Excess Depreciation on Luxury Vehicles
If depreciation exceeds the annual cap, the excess depreciation is deducted beginning in the year after the vehicle’s regular depreciation period ends.
The annual cap for this excess depreciation is:
- $7,060 for passenger cars and
- $7,060 for SUVS, trucks, and vans.
Lease Inclusion Amounts for Cars, SUVs, Trucks and Vans
If a vehicle is first leased in 2025, a taxpayer must add a lease inclusion amount to gross income in each year of the lease if its fair market value at the time of the lease is more than:
- $62,000 for a passenger car, or
- $62,000 for an SUV, truck or van.
The 2025 lease inclusion tables provide the lease inclusion amounts for each year of the lease.
The lease inclusion amount results in a permanent reduction in the taxpayer’s deduction for the lease payments.
The leadership of the Senate Finance Committee have issued a discussion draft of bipartisan legislative proposals to make administrative and procedural improvements to the Internal Revenue Service.
The leadership of the Senate Finance Committee have issued a discussion draft of bipartisan legislative proposals to make administrative and procedural improvements to the Internal Revenue Service.
These fixes were described as "common sense" in a joint press release issued by committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)
"As the tax filing season gets underway, this draft legislation suggests practical ways to improve the taxpayer experience," the two said in the joint statement. "These adjustments to the laws governing IRS procedure and administration are designed to facilitate communication between the agency and taxpayers, streamline processes for tax compliance, and ensure taxpayers have access to timely expert assistance."
The draft legislation, currently named the Taxpayer Assistance and Services Act, covers a range of subject areas, including:
- Tax administration and customer service;
- American citizens abroad;
- Judicial review;
- Improvements to the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate;
- Tax Return Preparers;
- Improvements to the Independent Office of Appeals;
- Whistleblowers;
- Stopping tax penalties on American hostages;
- Small business; and
- Other miscellaneous issues.
A summary of the legislative provisions can be found here.
Some of the policies include streamlining the review of offers-in-compromise to help taxpayers resolve tax debts; clarifying and expanding Tax Court jurisdiction to help taxpayers pursue claims in the appropriate venue; expand the independent of the National Taxpayer Advocate; increase civil and criminal penalties on tax professionals that do deliberate harm; and extend the so-called "mailbox rule" to electronic submissions to provide more certainty that submissions to the IRS are done in a timely manner.
National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins said in a statement that the legislation "would significantly strengthen taxpayer rights in nearly every facet of tax administration."
Likewise, the American Institute of CPAs voiced their support for the legislative proposal.
Melaine Lauridsen, vice president of Tax Policy and Advocacy at AICPA, said in a statement that the proposal "will be instrumental in establishing a foundation that helps simplify some of the laborious tax filing processes and allows taxpayers to better meet their tax obligation. We look forward to working with Senators Wyden and Crapo as this discussion draft moves forward."
By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor
A limited liability company (LLC) classified as a TEFRA partnership could not claim a charitable contribution deduction for a conservation easement because the easement deed failed to comply with the perpetuity requirements under Code Sec. 170(h)(5)(A) and Reg. § 1.170A-14(g)(6). The Tax Court determined that the language of the deed did not satisfy statutory requirements, rendering the claimed deduction invalid.
A limited liability company (LLC) classified as a TEFRA partnership could not claim a charitable contribution deduction for a conservation easement because the easement deed failed to comply with the perpetuity requirements under Code Sec. 170(h)(5)(A) and Reg. § 1.170A-14(g)(6). The Tax Court determined that the language of the deed did not satisfy statutory requirements, rendering the claimed deduction invalid.
Easement Valuation
The taxpayer asserted that the highest and best use of the property was as a commercial mining site, supporting a valuation significantly higher than its purchase price. However, the Court concluded that the record did not support this assertion. The Court found that the proposed mining use was not financially feasible or maximally productive. The IRS’s expert relied on comparable sales data, while the taxpayer’s valuation method was based on a discounted cash-flow analysis, which the Court found speculative and not supported by market data.
Penalties
The taxpayer contended that the IRS did not comply with supervisory approval process under Code Sec. 6751(b) prior to imposing penalties. However, the Court found that the concerned IRS revenue agent duly obtained prior supervisory approval and the IRS satisfied the procedural requirements under Code Sec. 6751(b). Because the valuation of the easement reported on the taxpayer’s return exceeded 200 percent of the Court-determined value, the misstatement was deemed "gross" under Code Sec. 6662(h)(2)(A)(i). Accordingly, the Court upheld accuracy-related penalties under Code Sec. 6662 for gross valuation misstatement, substantial understatement, and negligence.
Green Valley Investors, LLC, TC Memo. 2025-15, Dec. 62,617(M)
The Tax Court ruled that IRS Appeals Officers and Team Managers were not "Officers of the United States." Therefore, they did not need to be appointed under the Appointments Clause.
The Tax Court ruled that IRS Appeals Officers and Team Managers were not "Officers of the United States." Therefore, they did not need to be appointed under the Appointments Clause.
The taxpayer filed income taxes for tax years 2012 (TY) through TY 2017, but he did not pay tax. During a Collection Due Process (CDP) hearing, the taxpayer raised constitutional arguments that IRS Appeals and associated employees serve in violation of the Appointments Clause and the constitutional separation of powers.
No Significant Authority
The court noted that IRS Appeals officers do not wield significant authority. For instance, the officers do not have authority to examine witnesses, unlike Tax Court Special Trial Judges (STJs) and SEC Administrative Law Judges (ALJs). The Appeals officers also lack the power to issue, serve, and enforce summonses through the IRS’s general power to examine books and witnesses.
The court found no reason to deviate from earlier judgments in Tucker v. Commissioner (Tucker I), 135 T.C. 114, Dec. 58,279); and Tucker v. Commissioner (Tucker II), CA-DC, 676 F.3d 1129, 2012-1 ustc ¶50,312). Both judgments emphasized the court’s observations in the current case. In Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (per curiam), the Supreme Court similarly held that Federal Election Commission (FEC) commissioners were not appointed in accordance with the Appointments Clause, and thus none of them were permitted to exercise "significant authority."
The taxpayer lacked standing to challenge the appointment of the IRS Appeals Chief, and said officers under the Appointments Clause, and the removal of the Chief under the separation of powers doctrine.
IRC Chief of Appeals
The taxpayer failed to prove that the Chief’s tenure affected his hearing and prejudiced him in some way, under standards in United States v. Smith, 962 F.3d 755 (4th Cir. 2020) and United States v. Castillo, 772 F. App’x 11 (3d Cir. 2019). The Chief did not participate in the taxpayer's CDP hearing, and so the Chief did not injure the taxpayer. The taxpayer's injury was not fairly traceable to the appointment (or lack thereof) of the Chief, and the Chief was too distant from the case for any court order pointed to him to redress the taxpayer's harm.
C.C. Tooke III, 164 TC No. 2, Dec. 62,610
The IRS has joined with several leading nonprofit groups to highlight a special tax provision that allows more people to deduct donations to qualifying charities on their 2021 income tax return. Accordingly, the Independent Sector and National Council of Nonprofits joined with the IRS to highlight this pandemic-related provision where married couples filing jointly can deduct up to $600 in cash donations and individual taxpayers can deduct up to $300 in donations.
The IRS has joined with several leading nonprofit groups to highlight a special tax provision that allows more people to deduct donations to qualifying charities on their 2021 income tax return. Accordingly, the Independent Sector and National Council of Nonprofits joined with the IRS to highlight this pandemic-related provision where married couples filing jointly can deduct up to $600 in cash donations and individual taxpayers can deduct up to $300 in donations.
Taxpayers do not need to itemize deductions on their tax returns, under the temporary law, to take advantage of the tax provision, which creates tax-favorable donation options not normally available to about 90 percent of tax filers. Ordinarily, people who choose to take the standard deduction cannot claim a deduction for their charitable contributions. But this special provision permits them to claim a limited deduction on their 2021 federal income tax returns for cash contributions made to qualifying charitable organizations by December 31, 2021.
Further, the IRS highlighted the new provision and urged people to make sure they donate to a qualifying charity. The special Tax Exempt Organization Search tool on the IRS website can help people make sure they donate to a qualified charity. Cash contributions to most charitable organizations qualify for a deduction. But contributions made either to supporting organizations or to establish or maintain a donor advised fund do not. Contributions carried forward from prior years do not qualify, nor do contributions to most private foundations and most cash contributions to charitable remainder trusts.
Nearly nine in ten taxpayers take the standard deduction and could potentially qualify. Under this provision, tax year 2021 individual tax filers, including married individuals filing separate returns, can claim a deduction of up to $300 for cash contributions made to qualifying charities during 2021. The maximum deduction is increased to $600 for married individuals filing joint returns. Moreover, cash contributions include those made by check, credit card or debit card as well as amounts incurred by an individual for unreimbursed out-of-pocket expenses in connection with their volunteer services to a qualifying charitable organization. However, cash contributions do not include the value of volunteer services, securities, household items or other property.
Finally, the IRS encouraged all donors to be wary of scams masked as charitable solicitations. Criminals create fake charities to take advantage of the public’s generosity. Fake charities once again made the IRS's Dirty Dozen list of tax scams for 2021. In October, the IRS also joined international organizations and other regulators in highlighting the fight against charity fraud.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued the final rule implementing the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Program.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued the final rule implementing the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Program.
The program, created as part of the American Rescue Plan, provides $350 billion to state, local, and tribal governments to support their response to the COVID-19 pandemic, ensuring they have resources to provide for health and vaccine services, funding to support families and business who might be struggling with the economic impacts of the pandemic, and maintaining vital public services.
The final rule, announced January 6, includes some changes from the interim final rule that was issued and went into effect in May 2021. According to a summary document issued by the Treasury Department, the final rule "delivers broader flexibility and greater simplicity in the program."
Among the changes, the final rule includes:
-
an expansion of the non-exhaustive list of uses that recipients can use to respond to COVID-19 and its economic impacts, including clarifying that funds can be used for certain capital expenditures to respond to the pandemic;
-
an expansion of support for public sector hiring and capacity;
-
a streamlined option to provide premium pay for essential workers;
-
a broadening of eligible water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure projects; and
-
a simplified program for small localities.
The Treasury Department said it has distributed more than $245 billion in funds under this program in 2021.
The full text of the final rule, goes into effect on April 1, 2022. Until then, the interim final rule remains in effect. However, the summary document notes that "recipients can choose to take advantage of the final rule’s flexibilities and simplifications now, even ahead of the effective date. Treasury will not take action to enforce the interim final rule to the extent that a use of funds is consistent with the terms of the final rule, regardless of when the SLFRF funds were used."
The IRS extended several deadlines related to the low-income housing credit, in response to the continuing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and precautions necessitated by new disease variants.
The IRS extended several deadlines related to the low-income housing credit, in response to the continuing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and precautions necessitated by new disease variants. The extensions generally apply to deadlines that occur between April 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022, for the:
-
10-percent test for carryover allocations,
-
24-month minimum rehabilitation expenditure period (through December 31, 2023),
-
placed in service deadline,
-
reasonable period for restoration or replacement after a casualty loss,
-
period for satisfying occupancy obligations, and
-
correction period.
Certain requirements for housing agencies are also postponed or temporarily waived, including tenant file reviews, physical inspections to monitor compliance, availability of common areas and amenities, the conduct of public hearings, and the provision of emergency housing for medical personnel and other essential workers.
Finally, for qualified residential rental projects, the 12-month transition period is extended through 2022, and the two-year rehabilitation expenditure period for bonds is extended through 2023.
Notice 2020-23, Notice 2020-53, Notice 2021-12, Notice 2021-17, Rev. Proc. 2004-39, Rev. Proc. 2014-49, and Rev. Proc. 2014-50 are amplified.
Two recent reports, one from the Internal Revenue Service and the other from the National Taxpayer Advocate, show how the ongoing pandemic exposed the effects of being an underfunded agency.
Two recent reports, one from the Internal Revenue Service and the other from the National Taxpayer Advocate, show how the ongoing pandemic exposed the effects of being an underfunded agency.
The IRS in its recently issued Progress Update report for fiscal year 2021, highlights some of those issues caused by the pandemic and how the agency is working to respond to them.
In a separate blog post about the report, IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig noted that the agency is "working through tax returns filed in 2021 and we are unable to answer an unprecedented number of telephone calls. Simply put, in many areas we are unable to deliver the amount of service and enforcement our taxpayers and tax system deserves and needs."
He said the IRS will do all it can in 2022 and beyond with the resources it has, but added that "additional resources would help our employees do more in 2022 and beyond".
Indeed, the progress report highlights that the agency "lost more critical full-time positions between FY 2020 and FY 2021, which included key enforcement personnel. These loses included revenue agents and revenue officers who audit returns and perform collection activities, as well as special agents in our Criminal Investigations organization who investigate tax-related crimes and other issues. Although our workforce increased since FY 2019, the IRS FY 2021 permanent workforce is still below the FY 2010 permanent workforce level."
In spite of the challenges, the report highlighted some of the year’s successes, including distributing a third round of economic stimulus payments and other changes that were part of the American Rescue Plan, issuing a Spanish-language Form 1040, a 93 percent conviction rate within its Criminal Investigations division, and collecting $4.1 trillion in gross tax receipts.
National Taxpayer Advocate More Critical
While the IRS report focused on more of the positive accomplishments of the agency in FY 2021, the National Taxpayer Advocate’s annual report to Congress painted a more critical picture of a struggling agency, with one key agreement – that the agency needs more resources to effectively do its job.
"Over the past year, there has been a tendency to focus on the unique challenges posed by the pandemic and to attribute IRS service and technology shortcomings to these circumstances", National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins wrote in the report. "There is no doubt the pandemic has had a big impact, but taxpayer services and technology at the IRS were inadequate long before the pandemic."
For example, she notes that the number of individual returns has increased by 19 percent since FY 2010 while the agency’s baseline appropriation on an inflation-adjusted basis has decreased by nearly 20 percent. One way this has affected the agency was in its ability to answer calls, something it was struggling to do prior to the pandemic. In FY 2019, it received nearly 100 million calls, but answered only 29 million calls.
"That is simply a resource issue. Additional technology resources and more employees are required if the IRS is going to answer more telephone calls," Collins said.
The NTA report also noted that as of December 18, 2021, the IRS reported 2.3 million unprocessed returns and amended returns.
"We have seen cases where processing has taken considerably longer than 20 weeks, including more than a year," Collins said in the report. "The manual reviews will take substantial time, preventing the IRS from digging out of that hole in the foreseeable future."
It also noted that the agency took months to process taxpayer responses to IRS notices, delaying refunds and in some cases leading to premature collection notices.
The limited resources also affected the Taxpayer Advocate Service from doing its job adequately.
"Congress created TAS to serve as a ‘safety net’ for taxpayers, but over the past few years, the combination of more cases, fewer experienced Case Advocates, and an inability to close cases due to limited IRS resources has caused the TAS safety net to fray," Collins reported, noting that the number of cases from FY 2017 to FY 2021 rose by 58 percent while inflation-adjusted funding decreased by six percent. Cases comes from congressional referral rose dramatically as well, from an average of 10,000-11,000 referrals per year to 66,000 referrals last year.
Collins made a number of recommendations, including providing the agency with more funding; reduce barriers to e-filing; hire more customer service representatives and implement call-back technology to eliminate people waiting on hold; expand online functionality; and improve communications with taxpayers.
The IRS has encouraged taxpayers to take important actions this month to help them file their tax returns in 2022, including special steps related to Economic Impact Payments and advance Child Tax Credit payments. As a part of a series of reminders to help taxpayers get ready for the upcoming tax filing season, the IRS highlighted a special page the outlines the steps taxpayers can take to make the tax filing season easier.
The IRS has encouraged taxpayers to take important actions this month to help them file their tax returns in 2022, including special steps related to Economic Impact Payments and advance Child Tax Credit payments. As a part of a series of reminders to help taxpayers get ready for the upcoming tax filing season, the IRS highlighted a special page the outlines the steps taxpayers can take to make the tax filing season easier.
Advance Child Tax Credit Payments
The IRS advised families who received advance payments to compare the advance Child Tax Credit payments that they received in 2021 with the amount of the Child Tax Credit that they can properly claim on their 2021 tax return. Taxpayers who received less than the amount for which they're eligible can claim a credit for the remaining amount of Child Tax Credit on their 2021 tax return. Similarly, taxpayers who received more than the amount for which they're eligible may need to repay some or all of the excess payment when they file. Additionally, eligible families who did not get monthly advance payments in 2021 can still get a lump-sum payment by claiming the Child Tax Credit when they file a 2021 federal income tax return next year. This includes families who don’t normally need to file a return.
The IRS announced that it would send Letter 6419 in January 2022 with the total amount of advance Child Tax Credit payments taxpayers received in 2021. Taxpayers should keep this and any other IRS letters about advance Child Tax Credit payments with their tax records.
Economic Impact Payments and Recovery Rebate Credit
Individuals who failed to qualify for the third Economic Impact Payment (EIP) or did not receive the full amount may be eligible for the Recovery Rebate Credit based on their 2021 tax information. Accordingly, these individuals will need to file a 2021 tax return, even if they do not usually file, to claim the credit. Further, individuals will also need the amount of their third EIP and any Plus-Up Payments received to calculate their correct 2021 Recovery Rebate Credit amount when they file their tax return.
Charitable Deduction Changes
Finally, taxpayers who do not itemize deductions may qualify to take a charitable deduction of up to $600 for married taxpayers filing joint returns and up to $300 for all other filers for cash contributions made in 2021 to qualifying organizations.
The IRS has extended the availability of electronic signatures on certain audit and non-audit forms. Through October 31, 2023, taxpayers and their authorized representatives may electronically sign documents and email documents to the IRS. This is an exception to normal policy. Previously, the IRS had allowed e-signatures through the end of 2021.
The IRS has extended the availability of electronic signatures on certain audit and non-audit forms. Through October 31, 2023, taxpayers and their authorized representatives may electronically sign documents and email documents to the IRS. This is an exception to normal policy. Previously, the IRS had allowed e-signatures through the end of 2021.
Audit or Collection
The Service will accept e-signatures during audit or collection for:
-
extensions of statute of limitations on an assessment or collection;
-
waivers of statutory notice of deficiency and consents to an assessment;
-
closing agreements; and
-
other statements or forms collected outside standard filing procedures.
The IRS accepts two types of electronic signatures during an audit or collection interaction (1) digital signatures, and (2) imaged signatures. Regarding imaging signatures, taxpayers that do not have a digital certificate may hand sign a document, and then scan or photograph the document and save it in a standard picture format such as JPEG, TIFF or PDF.
Other Forms That Can Be Electronically Signed
Electronic signatures are also allowed through October 31, 2023 for the following forms and purposes:
-
Form 11-C, Occupational Tax and Registration Return for Wagering;
-
Form 637, Application for Registration (For Certain Excise Tax Activities);
-
Form 706, U.S. Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return;
-
Form 706-A, U.S. Additional Estate Tax Return;
-
Form 706-GS(D), Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Return for Distributions;
-
Form 706-GS(D-1), Notification of Distribution from a Generation-Skipping Trust;
-
Form 706-GS(T), Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Return for Terminations;
-
Form 706-QDT, U.S. Estate Tax Return for Qualified Domestic Trusts;
-
Form 706 Schedule R-1, Generation Skipping Transfer Tax;
-
Form 706-NA, U.S. Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return;
-
Form 709, U.S. Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return;
-
Form 730, Monthly Tax Return for Wagers;
-
Form 1042, Annual Withholding Tax Return for U.S. Source Income of Foreign Persons;
-
Form 1066, U.S. Income Tax Return for Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit;
-
Form 1120-C, U.S. Income Tax Return for Cooperative Associations;
-
Form 1120-FSC, U.S. Income Tax Return of a Foreign Sales Corporation;
-
Form 1120-H, U.S. Income Tax Return for Homeowners Associations;
-
Form 1120-IC DISC, Interest Charge Domestic International Sales – Corporation Return;
-
Form 1120-L, U.S. Life Insurance Company Income Tax Return;
-
Form 1120-ND, Return for Nuclear Decommissioning Funds and Certain Related Persons;
-
Form 1120-PC, U.S. Property and Casualty Insurance Company Income Tax Return;
-
Form 1120-REIT, U.S. Income Tax Return for Real Estate Investment Trusts;
-
Form 1120-RIC, U.S. Income Tax Return for Regulated Investment Companies;
-
Form 1120-SF, U.S. Income Tax Return for Settlement Funds (Under Section 468B);
-
Form 1127, Application for Extension of Time for Payment of Tax Due to Undue Hardship;
-
Form 1128, Application to Adopt, Change or Retain a Tax Year;
-
Form 2678, Employer/Payer Appointment of Agent;
-
Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method;
-
Form 3520, Annual Return to Report Transactions with Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts;
-
Form 3520-A, Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner;
-
Form 4421, Declaration – Executor’s Commissions and Attorney’s Fees;
-
Form 4768, Application for Extension of Time to File a Return and/or Pay U.S. Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Taxes;
-
Form 8038, Information Return for Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bond Issues;
-
Form 8038-G, Information Return for Tax-Exempt Governmental Bonds;
-
Form 8038-GC; Information Return for Small Tax-Exempt Governmental Bond Issues, Leases, and Installment Sales;
-
Form 8283, Noncash Charitable Contributions;
-
Form 8453 series, Form 8878 series, and Form 8879 series regarding IRS e-file Signature Authorization Forms;
-
Form 8802, Application for U.S. Residency Certification;
-
Form 8832, Entity Classification Election;
-
Form 8971, Information Regarding Beneficiaries Acquiring Property from a Decedent;
-
Form 8973, Certified Professional Employer Organization/Customer Reporting Agreement; and
-
Elections made pursuant to Code Sec. 83(b).
The IRS has issued guidance for employers on the retroactive termination of the COVID-19 employee retention credit against the employer's share of Medicare tax. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58) amended Code Sec. 3134 so that for most employers the credit applies only to wages paid before October 1, 2021. If the employer is a recovery startup business, the credit continues to apply to wages paid before January 1, 2022.
The IRS has issued guidance for employers on the retroactive termination of the COVID-19 employee retention credit against the employer's share of Medicare tax. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58) amended Code Sec. 3134 so that for most employers the credit applies only to wages paid before October 1, 2021. If the employer is a recovery startup business, the credit continues to apply to wages paid before January 1, 2022.
The guidance applies to employers that:
paid wages after September 30, 2021,
either received an advance payment of the credit for those wages, or reduced employment tax deposits in anticipation of the credit for the fourth quarter of 2021, but
are ineligible for the credit due to the change in the law.
Advance Payments
Employers that are not recovery startup businesses but received advance payments of the employee retention credit for fourth quarter wages of 2021 can avoid failure to pay penalties if they repay those amounts by the due date of their applicable employment tax returns. Failure to repay the advance payment by the due date may result in the IRS imposing failure to pay penalties.
Reduced Employment Tax Deposits
Employers that reduced deposits on or before December 20, 2021, for wages paid during the fourth calendar quarter of 2021 in anticipation of the employee retention credit but are not recovery startup businesses will not be subject to a failure to deposit penalty for the retained deposits if they:
reduced deposits in anticipation of the credit, consistent with the rules in Notice 2021-24;
deposit the amounts initially retained in anticipation of the credit on or before the relevant due date for wages paid on December 31, 2021, regardless of whether the employer actually pays wages on that date; and
report the tax liability resulting from the termination of the credit on the applicable employment tax return or schedule that includes the period from October 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021.
Failure to Deposit Penalty Waiver
Due to the termination of the employee retention credit for wages paid in the fourth quarter of 2021 for employers that are not recovery startup businesses, the IRS will not waive failure to deposit penalties for employers that reduce deposits in anticipation of the employee retention credit after December 20, 2021.
Reasonable Cause Relief
Employers that do not qualify for relief under this guidance can reply to an IRS penalty notice with an explanation. The IRS will consider reasonable cause relief.
Effect on Other Documents
This guidance modifies Notice 2021-49, IRB 2021-34, 316, and Notice 2021-24, IRB 2021-18, 1122.
The IRS has reminded tax professionals and taxpayers that they can use digital signatures on a variety of common IRS forms and access a secure online platform to view and make changes to their account. The IRS has balanced the e-signature option with critical security and protection needed against identity theft and fraud.
The IRS has reminded tax professionals and taxpayers that they can use digital signatures on a variety of common IRS forms and access a secure online platform to view and make changes to their account. The IRS has balanced the e-signature option with critical security and protection needed against identity theft and fraud. The Service has informed taxpayers that acceptable electronic signature methods include:
-
a typed name on a signature block;
-
a scanned or digitized image of a handwritten signature that's attached to an electronic record;
-
a handwritten signature input onto an electronic signature pad;
-
a handwritten signature, mark or command input on a display screen with a stylus device; or
-
a signature created by a third-party software.
The IRS will accept images of signatures (scanned or photographed) including common file types supported by Microsoft 365 such as .tiff, .jpg, .jpeg, .pdf, Microsoft Office suite, or Zip. Further, the IRS allows taxpayers and representatives to use electronic or digital signatures on certain paper forms which they cannot file using IRS e-file. The forms are available on the IRS website and through tax professional's software products.
The IRS has also added a new feature this year, which gives taxpayers digital control over who can represent them or view their tax records. The new feature, one of many recent enhancements to the Online Account for individuals, will allow individual taxpayers to authorize their tax practitioner to represent them before the IRS with a Power of Attorney (POA) and to view their tax accounts with a Tax Information Authorization (TIA). Tax professionals may go to the new Tax Pro Account on IRS.gov to digitally initiate POAs and TIAs. These digital authorization requests are simpler versions of Forms 2848 and 8821.
This new digital authorization option will allow the IRS to reduce its current CAF inventory and to focus on authorization requests received through fax, mail or the Submit Forms 2848 and 8821 Online – all of which require IRS personnel to handle. The Security Summit partners remind all tax professionals to review their security measures. IRS Publication 4557, Safeguarding Taxpayer Data (.pdf), provides tax pros with a starting point for basic steps to protect clients. IRS Publication 5293, Data Security Resource Guide for Tax Professionals (.pdf), provides a compilation of data theft information available on IRS.gov, including the reporting processes.
The IRS has reminded taxpayers that they can get extra protection starting in January by joining the Service's Identity Protection Personal Identification Number (IP PIN) program. The IRS has made recent changes to the program to make it easier for more taxpayers to join. The fastest and easiest way to receive an IP Pin is by using the Get an IP PIN tool.
The IRS has reminded taxpayers that they can get extra protection starting in January by joining the Service's Identity Protection Personal Identification Number (IP PIN) program. The IRS has made recent changes to the program to make it easier for more taxpayers to join. The fastest and easiest way to receive an IP Pin is by using the Get an IP PIN tool.
The IRS has urged any IP PIN applicant previously rejected during the identity authentication process to try applying again in 2022. The authentication process has been refined and improved, now enabling many taxpayers screened out in the past to have a better chance of passing the authentication process. Taxpayers are requested to keep in mind these key points about the IP PIN program:
-
For 2022, the Get an IP PIN tool is scheduled to launch on January 10. It’s the fastest and easiest way to get an IP PIN. It is also the only option that immediately reveals the IP PIN to the taxpayer. For that reason, the IRS urges everyone to try the Get an IP PIN tool first, before pursuing other options.
-
No identity theft affidavit is required for taxpayers opting in.
-
The IP PIN is valid for one year.
-
Taxpayers should enter the IP PIN on any return, whether it is filed electronically or on paper.
-
Anyone with either a Social Security number (SSN) or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) who can verify their identity is eligible for the IP PIN opt-in program.
-
Any eligible family member can get an IP PIN.
-
Taxpayers should never reveal an IP PIN to anyone. The only exception is a taxpayer who uses a trusted tax professional to file their return.
There are two options have been made available for people who cannot pass the IRS online identity authentication process. One involves filing Form 15227 and the other requires a visit to an IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center (TAC). Further, for processing year 2022, individuals with an adjusted gross income of $73,000 or less and those married filing jointly with an AGI of $146,000 or less with access to a telephone can complete Form 15227 (.pdf) and either mail or fax it to the IRS. Any taxpayer who is ineligible to file a Form 15227 may make an appointment to visit an IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center (TAC). Anyone using this option must bring two forms of picture identification. Because this is an in- person identity verification, an IP PIN will be mailed to the taxpayer after their visit. To find the nearest TAC, taxpayers can use the IRS Local Office Locator online tool or call 844-545-5640.
The Internal Revenue Service is now allowing taxpayers who have had an offer in compromise accepted by the agency to keep their tax refunds instead of the previous policy of having those refunds applied to their outstanding tax debt.
An offer in compromise (OIC) happens when the IRS and the taxpayer settle past due taxes for an amount that is less than the full amount owed. This typically happens when the agency agrees with the taxpayer that the payment in full will create a financial burden.
"For taxpayers facing an economic hardship, the anticipation of a refund may be the safety pin holding together a family’s ability to meet basic living expenses, especially for taxpayers relying on the Earned Income Tax Credit or the Additional Child Tax Credit that Congress intended for subsistence of low-income taxpayers," National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins said in a recent blog post discussing the changes, which went into effect in November. She added that it will also help those who are struggling financially because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The blog notes that the filing of an amended return could cause the refund to be applied to an existing debt rather than being sent to the taxpayer.
Additionally, the agency announced that certain taxpayers will be able to seek an offset bypass refund while OIC decisions are pending, although taxpayers need to be proactive in contacting the IRS if they want an offset bypass refund, as there is no formal form to request it.
No use worrying. More than five million people every year have problems getting their refund checks so your situation is not uncommon. Nevertheless, you should be aware of the rules, and the steps to take if your refund doesn't arrive.
Average wait time
The IRS suggests that you allow for "the normal processing time" before inquiring about your refund. The IRS's "normal processing time" is approximately:
- Paper returns: 6 weeks
- E-filed returns: 3 weeks
- Amended returns: 12 weeks
- Business returns: 6 weeks
IRS website "Where's my refund?" tool
The IRS now has a tool on its website called "Where's my refund?" which generally allows you to access information about your refund 72 hours after the IRS acknowledges receipt of your e-filed return, or three to four weeks after mailing a paper return. The "Where's my refund?" tool can be accessed at www.irs.gov.
To get out information about your refund on the IRS's website, you will need to provide the following information from your return:
- Your Social Security Number (or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number);
- Filing status (Single, Married Filing Joint Return, Married Filing Separate Return, Head of Household, or Qualifying Widow(er)); and
- The exact whole dollar amount of your refund.
Start a refund trace
If you have not received your refund within 28 days from the original IRS mailing date shown on Where's My Refund?, you can start a refund trace online.
Getting a replacement check
If you or your representative contacts the IRS, the IRS will determine if your refund check has been cashed. If the original check has not been cashed, a replacement check will be issued. If it has been cashed, get ready for a long wait as the IRS processes a replacement check.
The IRS will send you a photocopy of the cashed check and endorsement with a claim form. After you send it back, the IRS will investigate. Sometimes, it takes the IRS as long as one year to complete its investigation, before it cuts you a replacement check.
A bigger problem
Another problem may come to the fore when the IRS is contacted about the refund. It might tell you that it never received your tax return in the first place. Here's where some quick action is important.
First, you are required to show that you filed your return on time. That's a situation when a post-office or express mail receipt really comes in handy. Second, get another, signed copy off to the IRS as quickly as possible to prevent additional penalties and interest in case the IRS really can prove that you didn't file in the first place.
Minimize the risks
When filing your return, you can choose to have your refund directly deposited into a bank account. If you file a paper return, you can request direct deposit by giving your bank account and routing numbers on your return. If you e-file, you could also request direct deposit. All these alternatives to receiving a paper check minimize the chances of your refund getting lost or misplaced.
If you've moved since filing your return, it's possible that the IRS sent your refund check to the wrong address. If it is returned to the IRS, a refund will not be reissued until you notify the IRS of your new address. You have to use a special IRS form.
IRS may have a reason
You may not have received your refund because the IRS believes that you aren't entitled to one. Refund claims are reviewed -usually only in a cursory manner-- by an IRS service center or district office. Odds are, however, that unless your refund is completely out of line with your income and payments, the IRS will send you a check unless it spots a mathematical error through its data-entry processing. It will only be later, if and when you are audited, that the IRS might challenge the size of your refund on its merits.
IRS liability
If the IRS sends the refund check to the wrong address, it is still liable for the refund because it has not paid "the claimant." It is also still liable for the refund if it pays the check on a forged endorsement. Direct deposit refunds that are misdirected to the wrong account through no fault of your own are treated the same as lost or stolen refund checks.
The IRS can take back refunds that were paid by mistake. In an erroneous refund action, the IRS generally has the burden of proving that the refund was a mistake. Nevertheless, although you may be in the right and eventually get your refund, it may take you up to a year to collect. One consolation: if payment of a refund takes more than 45 days, the IRS must pay interest on it.
If you are still worrying about your refund check, please give this office a call. We can track down your refund and seek to resolve any problem that the IRS may believe has developed.